Friday, May 16, 2008

Photographic Manipulation

The extent to which photography has gone is beyond limitations. The continuing expansion of photography in the presence of the technological revolution shows that it has no bounds and is quite fascinating at that. The mere fact that any photograph can be taken and copied or manipulated (to produce a chosen image) is eerie in the sense that what you are looking at does, in fact, not exist. Photography is a form of art and should be considered as such, and only as such. By people being able to doctor pictures, it is showing that they are expressing what they want people to divulge. It is scray to think that someone can walk past me and take a picture of me; and then, the next day, on the internet there is a picture of me kissing a donkey's ass or something. Yet I would know for a fact that it never happened. However, who would believe me if people often tend to believe what they see? At least if people saw that it was a drawing or something then it would simply be regarded as a drawing and a thought and nothing more. It is hard to believe what you see if it is a reconstructed representation of reality,which allows for an extreme case of manipulation. A representation of reality is not reality in itself, but a simple representation of that reality; and, what is not real is basically a creation of humankind.

Instruments of Photography







There are various instruments used for photography and there have been many used and developed over the past. It is all about the technological advancement and consistent changing fashions that influence the different types of instruments that exist today. Photography involves taking many things into consideration: the size of the picture, the length of the shot, the angle to be used, the desired quality of the picture, the actual colouring to be used or emphasised etc….

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Development of Photography

Photography began a long time ago. Its development dates back to the eighteenth century. It began from mixing nitric acid, silver and chalk, where it was discovered that a darkening colour appeared after contact with direct sunlight. Thus began the black and white photography that is still witnessed today. The beginning of photography was a wholly scientific process that involved patience etc. However, as it developed it took on a huge attraction from artists and art-lovers alike. It was here that it became a form of art. It is amazing to note how photography has developed over the centuries into what it is today. In the early stages of development, it would take a few hours just for one photograph to be taken; plus, there were shadows as if the sun was shining from both sides. Now, a photograph can be taken and produced in an instant. From big boxes to small phones, the development of photography has co-existed with the progressiveness of technology. It is now possible for people to go deep down into the ocean and capture pictures of fish and other marine life. The development of photography even led to the development of motion pictures (a bunch of photo-stills put together to produce a continuous set of actions), which now play a major role in the entertainment industry. It is now even possible for a picture to be edited for various purposes. In terms of magazine publishing, a lot of photographs are edited; this is also known as air-brushing. Air-brushing is rather common in magazine publishing, where magazines get to manipulate the representations of reality in any way suitable. Photography has gone from science to art to forms of expression.

Selectivity


It is interesting to look at the way in which selectivity occurs in photography. When one is trying to get the 'perfect shot' everything has to be 'perfect' and according to someone's specific ideals. It is here where preparation and planning is often undertaken to ensure that a photograph displays what the photographer had intended to photograph. However, that is looking at things in minimal perspective. Looking at the bigger picture, photographs that are put in newspapers have gone through a process of selectivity known as gatekeeping. This process is common all over the world through all most forms of media (even in extreme cases the internet: if you look at China for instance, where the word DEMOCRACY cannot even be found on google. Imagine that? I bet you this blog will not even be accessible in China due to the fact that I have used the word democracy). It is whereby people can view selected pictures so as to be influenced, in a way, by those pictures that generally promote a certain ideology. The globe is a big place with competing ideologies, where the competition can be seen in the media. Ideology has even been referred to as image manipulation. There is, in fact, a fascinating article put forward on: http://www.transparencynow.com/news/Ideol.htm . You should check it out just for curiosity's sake. But then, how much easier is it to manipulate someone other than by controlling the gatekeeping process? Where there is a war taking place, it is more common to show the destruction of buildings than the piles of corpses all over the place.

Photography





What is it about photography that makes it important to us in our lives? Quite simple really, it freezes moments in time that can be appreciated for pretty much eternity and anywhere (possible) in the world. Looking at a photograph, it allows the viewer to be able to relive a moment from history, or witness something that merely happened in the past. However, the development of photography comes from the progression of art; or rather, the art of expression. Being able to express something allows a form of communication that enables ideas and messages that may be shared by one person to many people. There is, in fact, a phrase that says a picture tells a thousand words. The fact of the matter is a picture tells a story, just like a photo does. However, a frozen moment in time can easily be prepared for by the photographer or the person (people) being photographed. It is here where it must be mentioned that deception is possible to occur. The fact that someone can stage a photograph means that it cannot be regarded as evidence. Even in a court of law, photographs are considered inadmissable as items of evidence. Which puts photography firmly into the category of art. It is nothing but art. For example, when a person decides to capture a picture of something, quite a few things have to be taken into account: the angle of the shot, the length of the shot, as well as what 'should' or 'should not'. This brings on the question of selectivity.

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Popular Music and Culture



Blessings People,


I'm sure you're aware that populr music refers to the most common music that is aired daily on radio and television. Quite a number of people belive it to be the 'Britney Spears' or 'Michael Jackson' type of sound, when, hoever, hip hop and neo-RnB can also be seen as popular music - in South African society we can say that House music is quite popular. This then means that popular music refers to the mainstream music that we often are exposed to.



With the assistance of new mass media, a few music genres have found popularity within the members of society; particularly the young generation. Since genres vary from each other in terms of lyrical content; moral/message; the life-styles lived by members or musicians in that genre; the dresscode/attire of the musicians as well as the followers of that genre and also the places/locations of gathering where shows occur or where people (genre followers) 'hang out'. From this we can see that the genres create subcultures in our society where an identity is is also created for those invloved in that genres. Stereotypes and other perceptions arise when outsiders analyse the genres since they do not understand they culture lived by those individuals. For example, people belonging in the punk culture can possess atributes such as mohawks and such others; those who've adopt the neo-hip hop culture can be spotted by their baggy clothes and jewellery..



From viewing people from different cultures that are created by music genres one can see the distinction physically before they even understand the person individually.. Does this mean that the persona displays the identity of the population or does it mean that to belong to any of these just subcultures one actually has to act; dress; talk and walk a certain way? Is this the identity that a person has to live by? Its difficult to say since the new world (postmodern) requires people to live by an identity that is 'designed' on their behalf by society. What can a person call real? If the social identity is that which is created and the one obtained from subcultures, for instance, is one which a person 'chooses' themselves - they join the subculture knowing what identity is instore for them and probably one they have seeked..

What do you think? Check out the MTV website and explore the various cultures created by various popular music genres.. Its quite a thrill to see all the genres creating what is called 'popular music' yet the content of each genre has immense distinctions from most others.. See For Your Self..


Peace and Blessings...